Teaching

I conceive of all the courses I teach as extended conversations. Although I play the lead role as the facilitator of these conversations I strive to treat students as equal partners in the dialogical process because I believe they all have something valuable to contribute to the discussion. The ultimate goal of these conversations is threefold. First, and perhaps most importantly, I recognize that I have the responsibility to ensure that the classroom discussion reflects the course material and fulfills the core goals of the course. The conversation, though open to improvisation and digression, must help the students critically engage the subject matter and prepare them for the next step in their respective academic journeys. Second, I view the classroom experience as an opportunity for students to develop skills of critical analysis that aid in the formation of an individual voice. This voice should be formed in writing and speech, where they may clearly formulate their ideas while also being respectful of others involved in the conversation. Third, I hope to help students gain a certain level of distance and perspective on their own limited sphere of existence. I encourage students to use the same methods applied to historical figures, events, and ideas, and allow those methods to enhance their perspective on their own culture, religion, or social norms. In the end, I see each of these goals contributing to my ultimate concern, which is not dictating what students think but instead encouraging them to think in a respectful, self-critical fashion.

My philosophy of teaching did not simply develop out of my own teaching experiences. I have spent a significant amount of time refining my teaching by learning from my peers and also by participating in university sponsored workshops dedicated to pedagogy and teaching effectiveness. I have, however, most profited from the examples provided to me by professors who helped make my undergraduate and graduate education a success. In the end, whatever claim I have to being an adequate teacher I owe to the relationships that I have cultivated with great ones.

Ultimately, I believe students learn best when they are engaged co-contributors to the goals of their course. Since, however, my courses generally focus on difficult questions of religious, racial, national, and sexual identity this means they must be allowed to develop a voice that allows them to contribute to an evolving set of difficult questions posed by their fellow students and myself, I attempt to achieve this goal with a mix of humor and a carefully structured classroom environment. If I am successful, students are eager to contribute, rarely notice or feel constructed by the structure of the class, and develop strategies for learning and critical thinking without necessarily noticing that they are doing it.

Select lectures from AMXTIAN801: The Prosperity Gospel in America at Duke Divinity School, Spring 2023:

Select lectures from REL3152: Religion, Race, and Ethnicity at Florida State University, Spring 2020:

Course Evaluations:

Fall 2015 – REL3505

Fall 2016 – REL3505

Fall 2018 – REL3152

Fall 2019 – REL2121

Fall 2019 – REL3152

Spring 2016 – REL3505

Spring 2017 – REL2121

Spring 2018 – REL2121

Spring 2019 – REL3152

Spring 2020 – REL3152